You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it is good to know. And it is definitely a consideration for libraries in general. But I wanted to point out from a reactive standpoint I think this test doesn't matter for the list reconciler very much. Nested updates unless they replace the whole element avoid the list reconciler (which is why reactive is fast). From this perspective I think that makes udomdiff still the better choice for a reactive library?
EDIT: I see replace is the big one. Probably because doesn't do the shortcut there. I wonder how much code that'd take to remedy. And the scaling of append. Interesting. That deserves further investigation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it is good to know. And it is definitely a consideration for libraries in general. But I wanted to point out from a reactive standpoint I think this test doesn't matter for the list reconciler very much. Nested updates unless they replace the whole element avoid the list reconciler (which is why reactive is fast). From this perspective I think that makes udomdiff still the better choice for a reactive library?
EDIT: I see replace is the big one. Probably because doesn't do the shortcut there. I wonder how much code that'd take to remedy. And the scaling of append. Interesting. That deserves further investigation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: