Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interestingness Ranking of colored v.s. no colored bars #52

Closed
dorisjlee opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Interestingness Ranking of colored v.s. no colored bars #52

dorisjlee opened this issue Jul 30, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority high priority tasks (for dev)

Comments

@dorisjlee
Copy link
Member

Colored bars and lines currently have a fixed score of 0.2, which is perhaps a bit too high. There might be an issue with the interestingness calculation of the no colored bars since their values are all close to zero. Ideally, the no colored bars should be prioritized since they are simpler and more interpretable.
image
image

@dorisjlee dorisjlee added bug Something isn't working priority high priority tasks (for dev) labels Jul 30, 2020
@dorisjlee
Copy link
Member Author

With the new PR pulled in, the interestingness score for the colored visualizations are now dynamic. But the non-colored vis is still not showing up in the beginning. The visualization with Name should still be ranked lower than the rest. There might be something weird happening with the MEAN(*), Cylinders visualization since their scores are all close to 0.

image

@dorisjlee
Copy link
Member Author

This is fixed by @thyneb19 in #72. The Name visualization is deprioritized due to high cardinality. The cardinality downweighting factor is decreased in the unevenness metric.

image
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working priority high priority tasks (for dev)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants