Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vs. Typed Racket? #25

Closed
tliron opened this issue Jan 15, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Vs. Typed Racket? #25

tliron opened this issue Jan 15, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@tliron
Copy link

tliron commented Jan 15, 2017

Could you add a comparison to Typed Racket? What advantages to you see to Lux? Could you acknowledge advantages that Racket has?

@LuxLang
Copy link
Collaborator

LuxLang commented Jan 15, 2017

Not a bad idea.

I'll see if I write a wiki page about that during the week.

@bsima
Copy link

bsima commented Jan 17, 2017

Comparison to Shen would be interesting as well

@LuxLang
Copy link
Collaborator

LuxLang commented Jan 18, 2017

Comparison to Shen would be interesting as well

Also can do.

@LuxLang LuxLang closed this as completed Jan 23, 2017
@tliron
Copy link
Author

tliron commented Jan 24, 2017

I had no idea that you needed to pay for Shen to get concurrency. Stunning and damning.

@bsima
Copy link

bsima commented Jan 24, 2017

@tliron Tarver has a rather idiomatic perspective on OSS licensing: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/qilang/bsd%2420clause%7Csort:relevance/qilang/mVSJIyp-OhM/0XreitQq-ywJ

Idk if he's "correct" or "incorrect" necessarily, but at least that's some context for ya

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants