You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I encountered a strange behavior when analyzing the raw depth map. I noticed that the depth that I get from the OAK-D IoT 75 is scaled by factor of 0.5. I verified this behavior by using the spatial calculator example and placing the camera 1 m away from a wall. I compared two different camera's the OAK-D vs OAK-D IoT 75.
The insights so far is that the OAK-D gives me accurately 1 m as the distance between the camera to the wall, however when performing the same test with the OAK-D IoT 75 the depth that I get is 0.5 m (scaled by factor 0.5).
What is the reason for this scaling factor for the OAK-D IoT 75. Did I miss something, or forget to change something in the configuration of the camera itself? Any help or insights are appreciated!
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Have you changed the calibration of the cameram have you calibrated it on your own? (SW zoom, SW scaling?)
No, I did not re-calibrated the camera on my own this.
Hi everyone,
I encountered a strange behavior when analyzing the raw depth map. I noticed that the depth that I get from the OAK-D IoT 75 is scaled by factor of 0.5. I verified this behavior by using the spatial calculator example and placing the camera 1 m away from a wall. I compared two different camera's the OAK-D vs OAK-D IoT 75.
The insights so far is that the OAK-D gives me accurately 1 m as the distance between the camera to the wall, however when performing the same test with the OAK-D IoT 75 the depth that I get is 0.5 m (scaled by factor 0.5).
What is the reason for this scaling factor for the OAK-D IoT 75. Did I miss something, or forget to change something in the configuration of the camera itself? Any help or insights are appreciated!
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: