Changed methodname to: PROPERTY_EDITOR.canNotUsePropertyEditors()

[drapostolos]

I found the method name confusing, i.e. return null when we "can use property editors".

if (canUsePropertyEditors())
           return null;

So I figured "canNotUsePropertyEditors" would be a less confusing name.

/Alex

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same when pulling 80a18a5 on drapostolos:master into f461fa9 on lviggiano:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same when pulling 80a18a5 on drapostolos:master into f461fa9 on lviggiano:master.

[drapostolos]

I agree, a positive form is easier to read/understand.

Should this be changed too?:

``` java`
! isPropertyEditorDisabled()

So it becomes:

``` java
private boolean canUsePropertyEditors() {
     return isPropertyEditoryAvailable() && isPropertyEditorEnabled();
}

[lviggiano]

I would keep the method name as isPropertyEditorDisabled(), since PropertyEditor are enabled by default and to change that, you need to specify a system property as 'org.aeonbits.owner.property.editor.disabled=true'

        private boolean isPropertyEditorDisabled() {
            return Boolean.getBoolean("org.aeonbits.owner.property.editor.disabled");
        }

I added this because on Android the PropertyEditor classes are not available, so OWNER will check if these are available in the classpath and disable it automatically. The system property instead allows this to be done by the user. It came handy for unit testing; I think it's undocumented, I should document it possibly.

[lviggiano]

I just did a minor refactoring on Converters class, ensure to pull it from my master branch before to apply your changes. Thanks.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.0%) when pulling b1ec204 on drapostolos:master into f461fa9 on lviggiano:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.0%) when pulling b1ec204 on drapostolos:master into f461fa9 on lviggiano:master.