Add huge_tree support to HTMLParser. #261
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The argument is already documented in http://lxml.de/parsing.html#parser-options, so I don't think documentation changes are necessary, other than the already-changed docstring. There also seem to be no tests for the |
|
Thanks! |
This was referenced Mar 16, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HTMLParsercurrently has no support for thehuge_treeargument, which makes it impossible to correctly parse html documents with large text nodes.This has been reported as an issue for Scrapy (scrapy/scrapy#3077), and I was able to trace it back to lxml.