New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cannot reproduce results on Manifold40 #24
Comments
Hi Luca @lykius,
Feel free to reply if you have any more questions. |
Hi @lzhengning, Thanks a lot for your answer. |
Yes, 90.9% (without voting) and 91.5% (with voting) are the performance of this provided checkpoint. A network does not always achieve the highest accuracy both with and without voting. 91.2% and 91.5% are accuracies from two separated checkpoints in our experiments. Since 90.9% is quite close to the best, only the checkpoint with 91.5% voted accuracy is released for brevity. |
Ok thanks! |
Hi, I'm trying to reproduce your results on Manifold40.
I downloaded the dataset with the command
sh scripts/manifold40/get_data.sh
, which downloads the fileManifold40-MAPS-96-3.zip
. I noticed in your instructions that it is possible to download a different version of Manifold40 "before remeshing". Which is the correct version to use for evaluation?I noticed that the version in
Manifold40-MAPS-96-3.zip
contains approximatively 10 times the number of shapes contained in the original ModelNet40, why is that?I run the command
sh scripts/manifold40/get_pretrained.sh
to obtain the checkpoint for the model and then I run the commandsh scripts/manifold40/test.sh
to perform evaluation. The evaluation runs fine but I get a very low accuracy. Do you have any idea of what I could have missed?Thanks in advance,
Luca.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: