Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there a possibility of responding to smoothing fonts? #27

Closed
komikoni opened this issue Jan 17, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Is there a possibility of responding to smoothing fonts? #27

komikoni opened this issue Jan 17, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@komikoni
Copy link

I like beautiful fonts.
Smoothing font is best for 320 x 240 screen.
The M5Stack library incorporates TFT_eSPI, but smoothing fonts can not be used at this time.
However, if you apply patches, smoothing fonts are available.

m5stack/M5Stack#112

However, in M5ez which is essential to M5Stack, the display will collapse.

(Maybe M5Stack may correspond to smoothing fonts.) Is there any possibility that M5ez will correspond to smoothing fonts?

@ropg
Copy link
Collaborator

ropg commented Jan 17, 2019

Hey... Looks interesting. I should play with that at some point. First time I hear of these "smooth fonts", haven't seen anyone use them. I am struggling understand what you mean when you write "However, in M5ez which is essential to M5Stack, the display will collapse."

M5ez just uses TFT_eSPI through the M5Stack library, it doesn't do anything special. But it also doesn't load fonts from SD or SPIFFS, it expects them to be in memory. I could, I guess, make it so that when you specify a string instead of an address it will load a file by that name, but it's a big change because it's a lot of locations. I would need to be more convinced that lots of users want to use smooth fonts.

How does one create these smooth fonts?

Related: did you check out https://rop.nl/truetype2gfx ?

@paultech paultech added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 14, 2020
@vkichline
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your suggestion! We are preparing a minor update release which does not include this enhancement, but it is strongly under consideration for a future minor or major release. I am closing the issue and moving it to the product backlog. We'll review this in future release plans.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants