Support for newer browser #1
Comments
Hey! I forked this project but I re-implemented almost everything. It supports only rfc 6455 - https://github.com/felipecruz/cws/ Copyrights to the original author are in the source files. |
Am 06.08.2012, 20:57 Uhr, schrieb Felipe cruz
Ah, that's great, thanks a lot! Best regards, Georg |
just to clarify.. I created another repo because I wanted to create a library for rfc 6455 version only.. but I really liked the original API and some code :) hope this isn't a problem! |
@felipecruz Generally, this library wasn't created only for draft 76. I wish you fork from this repository and create upgraded version. If you make this, 23 peoples, who wathing this repo will knew about you changes. At this moment even I don't know about your fork. |
I'm sorry.. but I won't do that.. |
Hi, just tried your CWS library, but did not get it to work as expected. Any ideas? Thanks, Georg |
@lippit If your asking felipecruz - make issue in https://github.com/felipecruz/cws/ repo |
And I think, I'll support RFC 6455. I'll make this in few weeks |
I see you added support for RFC 6455 which is great. Are you planning on keeping hixie76 support for backward compatibility (i.e. iOS 5.1)? |
@jpproulx I'll read about this. First I'll make rfc support and then will introduce hixie76 support. |
@jpproulx I'll try keep backward compatability if it's implementable. |
@jpproulx I'll see on headers like Sec-WebSocket-Key1 and Sec-WebSocket-Version to determine which protocol version use |
@jpproulx Safari in iOS 6 have built-in support for RFC 6455. I think that it is not nesesary to keep backward compatability with hixie76 draft in cwebsocket library |
Cwebsocket does not work with newer browsers, like latest Chrome or Firefox, probably because it only supports Websockets Draft 76, but not RFC 6455
Are you going to support RFC 6455?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: