Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

‘re-balancing’ or not #43

Open
gnlup opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

‘re-balancing’ or not #43

gnlup opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@gnlup
Copy link

gnlup commented Mar 17, 2023

I'm a little confused about whether the dpca.m used 're-balancing' or not. I have thought that the dpca.m didn't use 're-balancing'(the default setting is to accept 'balanced' data), while the input of dpca function is "Xfull" with D+1 dimensions, just as 'firingRatesAverage'. According to the paper on eLife(Kobak, 2016) , if you want to 're-balance' the data, replace X with $\tilde{X}$. The 'Xfull' with D+1 dimensions is just the same as $\tilde{X}$(except that $\tilde{X}$ is flattened). So, the dpca.m used 're-balancing' because it accepts $\tilde{X}$ as input rather than X? Moreover, the default setting is to deal with 'unbalanced' data rather than 'balanced' data?
I'm new to dPCA and MATLAB, and sorry about my poor English. Hope I make my question clear. Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant