Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DB: external_uri should take list of values #74

Closed
4 tasks done
eins78 opened this issue Mar 20, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

DB: external_uri should take list of values #74

eins78 opened this issue Mar 20, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@eins78
Copy link
Contributor

eins78 commented Mar 20, 2018

2 times, columns in both tables keywords and people

  • db: migrate schema + data to array
  • admin: edit fields support multiple values
  • admin: index/show support array of links
  • webapp: show pages support array of links
@nadjaweisskopf
Copy link

@eins78 Refinement with Philipp, Matus, Thomas and Tashi:
first question: one screenshot is a person, one is a tag
solutions:

  1. As good as possible - check URL, split on white space and commas
  2. solution from Max
  3. Shouldn't we rather introduce meta keys on persons too --> RDF-scheme - think about this solution too

Decide, if only for this field or for all necessary fields.

@nadjaweisskopf
Copy link

could be a ticket for Michal - but not very important

@eins78
Copy link
Contributor Author

eins78 commented Apr 11, 2019

finished DB migration and API backwards-compatibilty
6a2e982

@eins78 eins78 self-assigned this Apr 11, 2019
@eins78
Copy link
Contributor Author

eins78 commented Apr 12, 2019

finished

  • editing in admin ui (people and keywords)
  • display list of URIs (people and keywords)
  • for people, decorate some known links ("Normdaten", see below)
  • test for everything

Screen Shot 2019-04-12 at 17 19 13

@eins78 eins78 closed this as completed in 042de33 Apr 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants