Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Accept an abstract-blob-store #15

Open
hackergrrl opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Accept an abstract-blob-store #15

hackergrrl opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@hackergrrl
Copy link

hackergrrl commented Aug 4, 2017 •
edited
Loading

This would be even more powerful if it accepted any blob store, instead of baking in filesystem storage.
@bcomnes
Copy link
Collaborator

bcomnes commented Aug 4, 2017

abstract-content-addressable-blob-store ?

@hackergrrl
Copy link
Author

If you didn't provide resolve() then the constructor could just accept a blob-store instance.

@bcomnes
Copy link
Collaborator

bcomnes commented Dec 10, 2018

I like the idea

@bcomnes bcomnes mentioned this issue Aug 8, 2019
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bcomnes @hackergrrl