Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add comments to build files/documentation on the difference between agw_of vs mme_oai #14900

Closed
LKreutzer opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #14911
Closed
Assignees
Labels
bazel changes for the Bazelification effort component: docs Documentation-related issue

Comments

@LKreutzer
Copy link
Contributor

Add comments to build files/documentation on the difference between agw_of vs mme_oai. It may be confusing why there are two different targets for MME. Explain the difference and use-cases. See Makefile for ideas for a description - can we make it more precise than that?

# FEATURES: What kind of flavours do you want your MME or AGW have in it
# MME is MME as described in 3GPP specs, it has at least S1AP, S11, S6a
# interfaces.
# AGW means Acces GateWay, is the result of the aggregation of MME, SGW and PGW.
# First in FEATURES, select what to you want to build : mme or agw with OpenFlow
# (OVS): FEATURE=mme_oai or agw_of
# Then you can have other features that can be built for mme or agw :
# s6a with fd (freeDiameter)

# Default is agw with OpenFlow, gRPC over S6a , (no freeDiameter over s6a).
FEATURES ?= agw_of
# AVAILABLE_FEATURE_LIST : every feature not in this list will trigger an error.
AVAILABLE_FEATURE_LIST = agw_of mme_oai
REQUESTED_FEATURE_LIST = $(sort $(FEATURES))
@LKreutzer LKreutzer added component: docs Documentation-related issue bazel changes for the Bazelification effort labels Jan 27, 2023
@LKreutzer LKreutzer self-assigned this Jan 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bazel changes for the Bazelification effort component: docs Documentation-related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant