Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strong-Naming again... #88

Closed
punker76 opened this issue Sep 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Strong-Naming again... #88

punker76 opened this issue Sep 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@punker76
Copy link
Member

The author of the (in)famous "Still strong naming your assemblies?" blog article has now done an about-face and now advocates strong-naming your assemblies again in an update to that same blog post:

Though the information and concerns in this blog post are still very true, I’ve actually had a change of heart and I’m now advocating to Start Strong-Naming your Assemblies!!

Start Strong-Naming your Assemblies!

Microsoft's corefx team also now strong-names and while they say not every assembly needs it, it's still useful: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/blob/master/Documentation/project-docs/strong-name-signing.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant