You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
think with the present code client will not be able to work with the new Id thing in routing. maidsafe_client requires this to be present in the session packet (along with mpid groups) and also to encrypt/decrypt DirectoryListings etc.
It contacts maidsafe-types for that
maidsafe_types does the random symmetric and asymmetric key-pair generations
And that is how i think it should be - generation of secure keys in types library so that there is one place to go to if someone wants to audit/tinker it and also fits with the paradigm of maidsafe-types crate itself.
routing should not be the one generating keys - it should accept it in a package (like clientid stuff previously) and then do what ever it wants.
Anyway - unless types crate is changed it will break client as of now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
think with the present code
client
will not be able to work with the newId
thing in routing.maidsafe_client
requires this to be present in the session packet (along with mpid groups) and also to encrypt/decrypt DirectoryListings etc.It contacts
maidsafe-types
for thatmaidsafe_types
does the random symmetric and asymmetric key-pair generationsmaidsafe-types
has no provision to construct it from given keys - it is who generates it - see:https://github.com/maidsafe/maidsafe_types/blob/master/src/id/revocation_id_type.rs#L67
for example
And that is how i think it should be - generation of secure keys in
types
library so that there is one place to go to if someone wants to audit/tinker it and also fits with the paradigm of maidsafe-types crate itself.routing
should not be the one generating keys - it should accept it in a package (like clientid stuff previously) and then do what ever it wants.Anyway - unless types crate is changed it will break
client
as of now.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: