Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Custom device tier decision rules #7

Closed
manishekhawat opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Feat: Custom device tier decision rules #7

manishekhawat opened this issue May 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@manishekhawat
Copy link
Owner

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Need to provide option to developers to provide flexibility to pass the rules based on the cpu, ram, network attributes to decide high, low, mid range device type

Describe the solution you'd like
The deviceTypeCapture method should optionally accept an object format parameter with the rules based on cpu, ram and network connection criteria and return the current format output but based on those rules and not default rules. In case the rules are not provided then output the current default output. Thus it should not be a breaking change but an optional feature.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternate could be to accept the values of cpu, ram and network from the user in the method call and utilize those while comparing to decide on the device tier.

@manishekhawat manishekhawat added the enhancement New feature or request label May 4, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2023

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in next 30 days.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 3, 2023

This issue was closed because it has been stalled with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed Aug 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant