You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I have been using PepsNMR for a while now and am really happy with it.
There is this thing with the line broadening, though. I've always been wondering why the default expLB=0.3 produces as good as nothing in noise reduction. According to the help of Apodization a factor of exp(-t/expLB) is multiplied with the FID.
Looking at the code of Apodization the factor that is really applied is exp(-expLB*t) which amounts to close to nothing for the default expLB setting. To get a true line broadening of 0.3 Hz a value of expLB = 2 is required.
Am I misinterpreting something here or is this a bug in the help documentation?
Cheers
Andreas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I have been using
PepsNMR
for a while now and am really happy with it.There is this thing with the line broadening, though. I've always been wondering why the default
expLB=0.3
produces as good as nothing in noise reduction. According to the help ofApodization
a factor ofexp(-t/expLB)
is multiplied with the FID.Looking at the code of
Apodization
the factor that is really applied isexp(-expLB*t)
which amounts to close to nothing for the defaultexpLB
setting. To get a true line broadening of 0.3 Hz a value ofexpLB = 2
is required.Am I misinterpreting something here or is this a bug in the help documentation?
Cheers
Andreas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: