You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I notice that you have vectors and matrices. Would you be willing to accept PRs adding a few more dimensions? We can leave Vector and Matrix and make them aliases of something like Tensor1 and Tensor2. Then we can start to add operations like higher-dimensional convolution and such.
If this is outside the scope of aljabar, I don't mind creating a new crate, but I figure this is a good place for collective const generics experimentation on linear algebra, so I wanted to see if this is of interest.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
PR acceptance is pretty ad-hoc at the moment but I will say that any addition that is backwards compatible (I.e. passing existing tests) and provides such generality as described I think makes an extremely strong case for being accepted. At the very least, I would love to see whatever you come up with, whether it manifests as a PR here or in a separate crate
I notice that you have vectors and matrices. Would you be willing to accept PRs adding a few more dimensions? We can leave Vector and Matrix and make them aliases of something like
Tensor1
andTensor2
. Then we can start to add operations like higher-dimensional convolution and such.If this is outside the scope of
aljabar
, I don't mind creating a new crate, but I figure this is a good place for collective const generics experimentation on linear algebra, so I wanted to see if this is of interest.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: