-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 927
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The resulting implementation class does not have a set value #3578
Comments
@mawl01 the code you've shared does not look like code that MapStruct generates. It looks like code that has been decompiled from bytecode. Can you please share an example project where we can reproduce this |
Facing the same issue using 1.6.0.Beta1 where deeply nested source objects are missing the setter codes in the target object. SituationMapping(source = "a.b.c.d1", target = "name") Expected Behaviour
Actual Behaviour
As a result, the target object is being created but with its fields not populated. MapStruct Version1.6.0.Beta1 |
@alantanlc As I wrote in #3575, could you please provide a reproducer? |
@thunderhook ok i will share a reproducible example soon, thank you! |
Closing this for now. Once we have a reproducer from @alantanlc we'll reopen it. |
Expected behavior
Actual behavior
Steps to reproduce the problem
1. pom.xml configuration
2. class
MapStruct Version
1.5.5.Final
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: