New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
yes/no/maybe bicycle & walking values #774
Comments
Another example, |
Related to #453. |
Should we normalize it to |
Pass thru as long as it's not (I suspect some of those other values could probably be normalized (there look to be variants), but let's just pass them thru for now.) |
Correctly updated. There's more work to be done to normalize all these, that's tracked in #792. |
We're always including yes, no & other values on the new walking, bicycling ways. But should we only include
no
oryes
values contextually?For instance,
motor_vehicle: "no",
is interesting here because tracks are assumed to bemotor_vehicle: "yes",
, butfoot: "yes",
I think is assumed to beyes
, so why export that?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: