-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
where are the files "version-xxxx.texi" #88
Comments
I just failed too at CentOS7 (it also had to patch automake version to 1.13) |
I use GNU Automake 1.15, but this should not be important. The If you checkout a branch from the repository: they should not be there, but they should be created if you run If you unpack a tarball: the files should be already there, under the directory |
Thanks for replay! Another problem is: does the support for cre2 changed in newest version? when I run configure with |
There is another issue. When I build the release
I simply links both files to libcre2.so.0:
and try make again, the build completed successfully. But I don't know them right? |
I just checked the tarball and I see them in the
The binding to the library
Mh... not from the unpacked tarball. I guess these files are leftovers in the build directory and were created by an old Having leftover build files is not a big problem, anyway; if we use a separate build directory, every now and then we can just wipe it clean removing everything. The only thing that is worth saving is the |
(For some reason I see this comment in my inbox and in the lists of comments on Github, but I do not see it in the issue 88 web page itself. I reply anyway.)
The standard input/output ports under Vicare behave very much like the standard input/output channels in the C language.
The behaviour of the script is different from what we see when running the REPL: at the REPL every time we hit |
Thanks a lot. The post about "helloworld" has been deleted, because I have read the documents :-) Vicare workers well now, I cloned the latest source code from github, configure options are:
|
Such as version-scheme.texi, version-libs.text...
About ten months ago, I try to build vicare rpm package for OpenSUSE:
http://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=home%3Auternet&package=vicare-scheme
The files above are missing, I copy them from older version. but now, When I try to build deb for Debian, they are still missing...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: