Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Odd results for some accidentals #3

Closed
jncarey opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Odd results for some accidentals #3

jncarey opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@jncarey
Copy link

jncarey commented Mar 27, 2018

This is a neat piece of software -- thanks for writing it!

I've been playing with it a bit and noticed that for some "weird" accidentals like Cb the program outputs bizarre fingering choices. If I rewrite the note as B the fingering makes much more sense. I haven't tried the other comparable accidentals (B#, E#, Fb) to know if this is a general or specific problem (nor have I looked at double sharps or double flats). You may not even be actively working on this software anymore, but in case you are this is a minor issue that could use correcting. Thanks!

Best,
Jeffrey

@mhoangvslev
Copy link

mhoangvslev commented Jul 13, 2018

I think that fingering is completely per person basis. It is interesting to see a methodical approach to unify fingering techniques, but I think ultimately, you should always bring a pencil with you :)

@jncarey
Copy link
Author

jncarey commented Jul 14, 2018

Apologies if my post was unclear: the important point was not that the program sometimes outputs fingering choices that I personally consider odd. The point was that the program outputs entirely different fingering choices for two passages that are completely identical except for one version containing a Cb and the other version containing a B in its place.

@marcomusy
Copy link
Owner

Dear Jeffrey, thanks for your comment which for some reason I didn't notice.
I'm currently revising this package so I will try to reproduce and fix the bug you mentioned!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants