Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weird neighborhood for numerical tabular data #59

Closed
manoelhortaribeiro opened this issue Apr 9, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Weird neighborhood for numerical tabular data #59

manoelhortaribeiro opened this issue Apr 9, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@manoelhortaribeiro
Copy link

manoelhortaribeiro commented Apr 9, 2017

Edit: I misunderstood the sampling, still I find it weird that the neighborhood is so big.

Hello, I have read issue #39, and was trying to replicate the behavior described with lime_tabular.

However, I've stumbled upon some very weird neighborhood for a circle dataset. The neighborhood does't seem to be on the area around the point I have chosen, but all over the place. I'm getting weird neighborhoods like this (the yellow stars are the neighborhood obtained by LimeTabular):

image

This is better portrayed in this python notebook:

https://gist.github.com/manelhr/44c84b1580a8d1fa667309226a5d457b

Am i'm doing something terribly wrong or this is actually an issue? If I understand correctly the issues are sampled at random and added some random noise, shouldn't the scaler make this less spread?

Cheers,
and btw @marcotcr, very cool paper, proud you are from UFMG too ;)

@marcotcr
Copy link
Owner

As you probably understood by now, each of those samples will be weighted by how close they are to the original point, so the actual 'neighborhood' is not what you're plotting in the graph (if I understood correctly). In other words, the kernel should fix the fact that we generate samples in a way that does not try to be principled.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants