Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for AVM FRITZ!Box router's UI with new router firmware #83

Closed
Gordon-Dry opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 10 comments
Closed

Support for AVM FRITZ!Box router's UI with new router firmware #83

Gordon-Dry opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 10 comments

Comments

@Gordon-Dry
Copy link

Since the AVM FRITZ!Box routers get the latest firmware 7.50 they claim not supporting outdated browsers anymore:
FRITZ!Box_-_2023-02-11_01 16 09

@Gittyperson
Copy link

Related:

https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=28995

https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1240

@martok
Copy link
Owner

martok commented Oct 12, 2023

The original issue is solved, but since I've had the chance to play with an updated Fritzbox a few weeks ago and that doesn't alert on unsupported browsers, but instead just doesn't display the login window:

They now have the exact same buggy polyfill as #74. PM has everything they need, but their feature test code is buggy, which causes it to inject a Promise polyfill that doesn't contain Promise.any(). I've been trying to debug that for a few hours, but that didn't go anywhere other than increase my hate of Webpack.

@martok
Copy link
Owner

martok commented Jan 6, 2024

Resolved as UXP#2436 by implementing one more Promise feature. Should be in the next release.

@martok martok closed this as completed Jan 6, 2024
@Vangelis66

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@martok
Copy link
Owner

martok commented Jan 17, 2024

TIL: people can mark their own comments as off-topic.

Well, can you replicate a crash in xul.dll when visiting https://www.theregister.com/ with #2240 merged in and, if yes, does #2459 alleviate that?

No crash with or without #2459.

@Gordon-Dry
Copy link
Author

Gordon-Dry commented Jan 17, 2024

I don't see a proper solution.

I see the login screen with only the input field for the userid, but as there is no input field for the password no usability is gained.

Edit:
or do you refer to the next release of Pale Moon?

@Gittyperson
Copy link

"Next release" is clearly mentioned two posts above. That would be Pale Moon 33.

@Gordon-Dry

This comment was marked as abuse.

@Gittyperson
Copy link

Wow.

@martok
Copy link
Owner

martok commented Jan 17, 2024

This is not a kind of tone I will tolerate on my issue tracker. Gordon-Dry has been blocked from further posts.


The answer was in fact correct. Next release of UXP means next release of Pale Moon.

Repository owner locked as too heated and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants