__ and __n function naming

[eliOcs]

__ and __n may be a common syntax but they are not expressive. Configuration options should be included to choose other names.
This would also help with the conflict with the jade internals.

[mashpie]

in either way, you may register them with your own mappings, like you'd do for helpers:

// register helpers for use in templates app.helpers({ __i: i18n.__, __n: i18n.__n });

[eliOcs]

It's true defining helpers allows you to change the names anyway. Thanks.