Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to assess and correct for publication bias in three-level meta-analysis? #19

Open
Durling opened this issue Mar 27, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Durling
Copy link

Durling commented Mar 27, 2022

Dear Mathias
I was recently reading your book on meta-analysis"Doing Meta-Analysis in R: A Hands-on Guide",I used the method of three-level meta-analysis inside to complete my graduation design. One problem I encountered was that the results of the three-level meta-analysis were calculated using rma.mv in metafor, while the functions like eggers.test , trimfill in Chapter 9 Publication Bias cannot be applied to the results of rma.mv. I wonder how to correct the results of the three-level meta-analysis for publication bias. That's very important to me and hope you can help me, thank you!

@Durling Durling changed the title How to assess and correct for publication bias in meta-analyses? How to assess and correct for publication bias in three level meta-analyses? Mar 27, 2022
@Durling Durling changed the title How to assess and correct for publication bias in three level meta-analyses? How to assess and correct for publication bias in three-level meta-analysis? Mar 27, 2022
@JoshSchramm94
Copy link

not quite sure how far you got with your issue and which package you are using, however, in case you are using metafor, this might help you:

https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/2018-July/000939.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants