-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add copyright and license info to the ebml spec #5
Comments
@robUx4 Do we really want to have the specs licensed under the LGPL (which is what libEBML is using)? The Matroska legal info page states:
In that spirit I suggest we use something like Creative Commons Attribution or even Creative Commons CC0 No Rights Reserved. |
+1 for CC-BY or CC-0 |
RE: IETF, copyright resides with the contributors, though contributors grant the IETF Trust rights to sublicense, create derivative works, etc. (5.3) IETF will own the right to RFCs, in order to prevent unapproved changes to an RFC being published in an RFC format (3.6). By granting rights to the IETF, you're asserting that you have the right to do so and aren't infringing on anyone else's rights or IP. The relevant document is RFC 5378. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5378/?include_text=1 |
The specs don't mention any particular copyright notice. So regular copyright rules apply. Except it doesn't say who owns the copyright. In general that's the regulard copyright law that applies. On the Now I'm fine with giving more rights to the specs so they can be rearranged, modified. But we have to make sure someone doesn't write new specs that are incompatible and say they are the actual specs. So I don't think waiving the copyright as in CC0 is a good idea. But I'm not sure I fully understand how it works. Once we know the right copyright/CC rule to apply, we should apply it to the Matroska specs too. |
Would CC-BY be acceptable? See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
I would definitely be fine with CC-BY; it was one of the two licenses I've proposed. @robUx4 ? |
Sounds perfect, yes ! |
I've created a repository and added CC BY 4.0 as the license. What's left is to add author information. On the other hand the libebml repository is not the right place for this issue anymore. Therefore I'm closing it. |
It's unclear if the spec is under the same license and copyright as libEBML. I suggest clarifying this on the spec page: http://matroska-org.github.io/libebml/specs.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: