Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Switch contract verification API to axum and get rid of actix-web usage #1467

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Mar 22, 2024

Conversation

popzxc
Copy link
Member

@popzxc popzxc commented Mar 21, 2024

What ❔

  • Switches contract verification API to axum.
  • Switches an eth-signer test to use axum.
  • Adds support of contract verification API to the node framework.

Why ❔

We use axum for web servers nowadays.

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zk fmt and zk lint.
  • Spellcheck has been run via zk spellcheck.
  • Linkcheck has been run via zk linkcheck.

@popzxc popzxc added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 22, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit e7a9d61 Mar 22, 2024
29 checks passed
@popzxc popzxc deleted the popzxc-contract-verification-api branch March 22, 2024 08:10
montekki pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
…eb usage (#1467)

## What ❔

- Switches contract verification API to axum.
- Switches an eth-signer test to use axum.
- Adds support of contract verification API to the node framework.

## Why ❔

We use axum for web servers nowadays.

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
- [ ] Spellcheck has been run via `zk spellcheck`.
- [ ] Linkcheck has been run via `zk linkcheck`.
RomanBrodetski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[22.1.0](core-v22.0.0...core-v22.1.0)
(2024-03-28)


### Features

* Drop prover tables in core database
([#1436](#1436))
([0d78122](0d78122))
* **en:** consistency checker persistent cursor
([#1466](#1466))
([03496e6](03496e6))
* **en:** Make snapshot syncing future-proof
([#1441](#1441))
([8c26a7a](8c26a7a))
* **genesis:** Using genesis config only during the genesis
([#1423](#1423))
([4b634fd](4b634fd))
* **node_framework:** Add a task to handle sigint
([#1471](#1471))
([2ba6527](2ba6527))
* **node-framework:** Add circuit breaker checker layer to framework
([#1452](#1452))
([2c7a6bf](2c7a6bf))
* **prover:** export prover traces through OTLP
([#1427](#1427))
([16dce75](16dce75))
* sigint initialization only after snapshots is applied
([#1356](#1356))
([c7c7356](c7c7356))
* Split witness generator timeout configs by round
([#1505](#1505))
([8074d01](8074d01))
* **state-keeper:** implement asynchronous RocksDB cache
([#1256](#1256))
([da41f63](da41f63))
* **state-keeper:** Refactor persistence in `StateKeeper`
([#1411](#1411))
([e26091a](e26091a))
* **state-keeper:** Remove `WitnessBlockState` generation from state
keeper ([#1507](#1507))
([8ae0355](8ae0355))
* Switch contract verification API to axum and get rid of actix-web
usage ([#1467](#1467))
([e7a9d61](e7a9d61))


### Bug Fixes

* **api:** `filters_disabled` should only affect HTTP endpoints
([#1493](#1493))
([8720568](8720568))
* **api:** Fix API server shutdown flow
([#1425](#1425))
([780f6b0](780f6b0))
* **prover:** Remove FriProtocolVersionId
([#1510](#1510))
([6aa51b0](6aa51b0))
* **prover:** Remove redundant LoadingMode
([#1496](#1496))
([e7583f4](e7583f4))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants