Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fedora package? #28

Closed
Conan-Kudo opened this issue Feb 19, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed

Fedora package? #28

Conan-Kudo opened this issue Feb 19, 2024 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@Conan-Kudo
Copy link
Collaborator

Mir has been packaged in Fedora for many years now. It'd be great to see MiracleWM packaged in Fedora by someone interested in this type of environment, and perhaps produce a Fedora spin. 馃槈

@mattkae
Copy link
Owner

mattkae commented Feb 19, 2024

First of all, congrats on being the first non-mattkae issue maker 馃槈

Second, yes definitely! I'll look into this soon. It shouldn't be very difficult to build miracle and package it across multiple platforms and architectures

@mattkae mattkae added the feature New feature or request label Feb 19, 2024
@Conan-Kudo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Feel free to reach out to me if you need any help!

@mattkae
Copy link
Owner

mattkae commented Mar 9, 2024

Hi @Conan-Kudo , I am going to look into this tomorrow (or tonight). Any tips on where I could get started (specifically if it references cmake, that would be great 馃槃 ) I have zero knowledge of packaging for RPM, so a definitive guide would be much appreciated

@Conan-Kudo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The RPM Packaging Guide and the Fedora Packaging Guidelines are good starting places. Specifically for CMake type stuff, we have a page on using CMake in RPM package builds.

You may also find the Fedora package for Mir to be helpful as a concrete example.

@mattkae
Copy link
Owner

mattkae commented Mar 23, 2024

@Conan-Kudo Is there a reason why the mir package in Fedora isn't on 2.16.3 (latest) for Fedora 38 and Fedora 39?

@mattkae
Copy link
Owner

mattkae commented Mar 23, 2024

(P.S.: I almost have a Fedora build for you 馃槈 It is much simpler than I thought!)

@Conan-Kudo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Nobody has ever asked for it. I could update F39 since the MirAL ABI didn't break, but probably not F38 with how close to EOL it is. It is up to date in F40.

@mattkae
Copy link
Owner

mattkae commented Mar 23, 2024

Nobody has ever asked for it. I could update F39 since the MirAL ABI didn't break, but probably not F38 with how close to EOL it is. It is up to date in F40.

F39 would be good for me :) Although I might as well just use F40

@Conan-Kudo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Given that the F40 Beta ISOs are available now and it'll be released at the end of next month, F40 is probably the better bet. 馃槈

@mattkae mattkae self-assigned this Apr 3, 2024
@mattkae mattkae closed this as completed Apr 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants