You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using mutant on some code that uses kwargs, it came up with only one alive mutation:
-def initialize(name, includes:, **options)+def initialize(name__mutant__, includes:, **options)
super
end
Now obviously I can kill this one by renaming name to _name, but I noticed there were no mutations for includes to includes__mutant nor for **options to **options__mutant__. I think both of these should be added to make sure these options are being handled.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When using mutant on some code that uses kwargs, it came up with only one alive mutation:
Now obviously I can kill this one by renaming
name
to_name
, but I noticed there were no mutations forincludes
toincludes__mutant
nor for**options
to**options__mutant__
. I think both of these should be added to make sure these options are being handled.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: