-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test doesn't need the trained model? #17
Comments
Hi, Thanks you for you interrest. delta_p.p and normalize_factors.p are two files that avoid useless computation. If you delete it, the code will just compute them from data. If you delete iekfnets.p, you will have a filter without training parameters. The filter still works well but it is better once trained (See Section V-D in the paper). This is particularly remarkable. |
@mbrossar Thanks for your reply! I'm also wondering how did you set the parameters in class KITTIParameters?
` |
Hello, Mr/Ms. Zhang! Sorry to interrupt, I have tried to download KITTI IMU raw data many times, but I have been unable to succeed. Would you mind sharing it like Baidu Cloud? |
Hello, You can find my reformatted kitti data in google drive : https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DClhQEDayv2p4IJ1a9XydF-FpnWh5_EQ You can also find if required temp.zip at https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WPuC71kSb-dq0gSjrrSwWt8WM7XepKmd Martin |
Hello,
I found your paper very interesting and thanks for sharing the codes! I test the filters by running main_kitti.py, and got similar results as in paper. However, I didn't find in codes where you load the trained model for test. I deleted the provided training parameters (delta_p.p, iekfnets.p, normalize_factors.p), and it still generates the same results. Did you hard coded your trained parameters somewhere?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: