You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2022. It is now read-only.
No. struct is the right analogy. It implies a set of fields identified by their order (and the names are just convenient). dict and hash necessarily imply a set of unordered key–value pairs.
But: the input that gets encoded is a hash, and the output as decoded is a hash. So as far as a client of the library is concerned, it converts hashes (the details of the binarization, and the way values are matched to keys, is irrelevant housekeeping)
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: