Property Name:Can not construct instance of java.m specified is unsupported or invalid

[brandonros]

var item = { Name: 'FOO',
  Sku: 10,
  UnitPrice: 1,
  PurchaseCost: 0.5,
  Type: 'Inventory',
  TrackQtyOnHand: true,
  QtyOnHand: 'Sku',
  InvStartDate: '2016-01-30',
  IncomeAccountRef: { name: 'Sales', value: '1' },
  ExpenseAccountRef: { name: 'Supplies', value: '21' },
  AssetAccountRef: { name: 'Uncategorized Asset', value: '53' } };

var deferred = Q.defer();

var qbo = new QuickBooks(global['quickbooks_key'],
                         global['quickbooks_secret'],
                         token,
                         token_secret,
                         realm_id,
                         false, // don't use the sandbox (i.e. for testing)
                         true); // turn debugging on

qbo.createItem(item, function (err, res) {
    if (err) {
        return deferred.reject(new Error(JSON.stringify(err)));
    }

    deferred.resolve(res);
});

return deferred.promise;

{ request:
   { uri: 'https://quickbooks.api.intuit.com/v3/company/redacted/item?minorversion=4',
     method: 'POST',
     headers:
      { 'User-Agent': 'node-quickbooks: version 2.0.3',
        host: 'quickbooks.api.intuit.com',
        accept: 'application/json',
        'content-type': 'application/json',
        'content-length': 306,
        Authorization: 'OAuth oauth_consumer_key="redacted",oauth_nonce="redacted",oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1",oauth_timestamp="1454182385",oauth_token="redacted",oauth_version="1.0",oauth_signature="redacted"' },
     body: '{"Name":"FOO","Sku":10,"UnitPrice":1,"PurchaseCost":0.5,"Type":"Inventory","TrackQtyOnHand":true,"QtyOnHand":"Sku","InvStartDate":"2016-01-30","IncomeAccountRef":{"name":"Sales","value":"1"},"ExpenseAccountRef":{"name":"Supplies","value":"21"},"AssetAccountRef":{"name":"Uncategorized Asset","value":"53"}}' } }

[mcohen01]

The error messages you get back from the actual api sometimes are really poor. I think this should work if you change QtyOnHand to an integer.

[brandonros]

Thank you for that. I'm sorry I needed a second set of eyes on such a simple mistake!