Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distinguishing pseudo-element vs pseudo-class in CSS selectors #5272

Closed
bershanskiy opened this issue Dec 5, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Distinguishing pseudo-element vs pseudo-class in CSS selectors #5272

bershanskiy opened this issue Dec 5, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
data:css 🎨 Compat data for CSS features. https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/CSS idle 🐌 Issues and pull requests with no recent activity

Comments

@bershanskiy
Copy link
Contributor

In #3496 @Elchi3 and @jpmedley proposed classifying types of API features to automatically generate article slugs and compat table element descriptions. I believe it would be nice to also distinguish pseudo-element and pseudo-selectors among CSS selectors. Specifically, this would enable us to automatically generate descriptions and article like "<code>:selector</code>" or "<code>::selector</code>" and slugs like :selector and ::selector.

@queengooborg queengooborg added the data:css 🎨 Compat data for CSS features. https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/CSS label Dec 5, 2019
@ddbeck ddbeck added this to Tooling and broad data quality improvements in Prioritization review Sep 4, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the idle 🐌 Issues and pull requests with no recent activity label May 25, 2022
@Elchi3
Copy link
Member

Elchi3 commented Aug 10, 2023

Closing this as a duplicate of #3496

@Elchi3 Elchi3 closed this as completed Aug 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data:css 🎨 Compat data for CSS features. https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/CSS idle 🐌 Issues and pull requests with no recent activity
Projects
No open projects
Prioritization review
  
Tooling and broad data quality improv...
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants