Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

paper #4

Closed
abcxs opened this issue Mar 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

paper #4

abcxs opened this issue Mar 19, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@abcxs
Copy link

abcxs commented Mar 19, 2021

hello, the effect of large objects is a 9.3% difference, which is not small compared to others
image
image

@abcxs
Copy link
Author

abcxs commented Mar 19, 2021

Sorry, I see what you mean.
However, if you compare the first line to the third, it's still a big gap

@chensnathan
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your interest.

Yes. Uniform Matching has a big effect on objects across various scales when we apply it to the baseline (the first line). It makes the model be fully trained as all ground truths participate in the training phase. However, its effect on large objects diminishes when we add Dilated Encoder. Thus, we may think that Uniform Matching improves the performance of small and medium objects largely while Dilated Encoder dominates large objects' performance.

@abcxs
Copy link
Author

abcxs commented Mar 20, 2021

thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants