Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"No description available." for 0xc on melpa? #4519

Closed
xuchunyang opened this issue Jan 25, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

"No description available." for 0xc on melpa? #4519

xuchunyang opened this issue Jan 25, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@xuchunyang
Copy link
Contributor

I notice https://melpa.org/#/0xc and M-x list-packages show "No description available." for 0xc. However 0xc.el does contain a short description (https://github.com/AdamNiederer/0xc/blob/master/0xc.el#L1):

;;; 0xc.el --- Base conversion made easy
@xuchunyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, I didn't know that.

And from Emacs 25.1, M-x package-install-from-buffer on the previous version of 0xc.el then M-x describe-package 0xc provides a correct short description. In other words,

;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.4") (s))

is treated as

;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.4") (s "0"))

So I thought there might be something wrong with melpa or the version of emacs used by melpa to create package archive.

@syohex
Copy link
Contributor

syohex commented Jan 26, 2017

https://melpa.org/#/0xc

0xc issue is fixed by my PR. I think above PRs are merged then this issue is fixed too.

@syohex syohex closed this as completed Jan 26, 2017
@xuchunyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, it's fixed. Thank you.

@purcell
Copy link
Member

purcell commented Jan 28, 2017

;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24.4") (s))

package-lint detects this as an error. Very new versions of package.el allow the above, but that is backwards-incompatible, so it is best to avoid it.

@xuchunyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see. Thanks for telling.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants