Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Unifex] Implement lacking types for CNodes #726

Closed
mat-hek opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

[Unifex] Implement lacking types for CNodes #726

mat-hek opened this issue Jul 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@bartkrak
Labels
enhancement
Projects
What's happening in Membrane?

Comments

@mat-hek
Copy link
Member

mat-hek commented Jul 9, 2020 •
edited

See the comments below
@mickel8 mickel8 assigned mickel8 and unassigned mickel8 Jul 27, 2020
@mickel8 mickel8 mentioned this issue Aug 4, 2020
Merged
@mickel8
Copy link
Member

mickel8 commented Aug 20, 2020 •
edited

Types implemented in membraneframework/unifex#48 for CNodes

  • string
  • uint
  • list
  • atom as function param (atom as return type has already been implemented)
  • pid as return type (pid as function param has already been implemented)

Remaining types for CNodes:

  • bool
  • uint64
  • int64

@mickel8 mickel8 mentioned this issue Aug 31, 2020
Merged
@mickel8
Copy link
Member

mickel8 commented Sep 1, 2020

bool type has been implemented in membraneframework/unifex#57

Remaining types for CNodes:

  • uint64
  • int64

@mat-hek mat-hek transferred this issue from membraneframework/unifex Jan 30, 2024
@mat-hek mat-hek changed the title Implement lacking types for CNodes [Unifex] Implement lacking types for CNodes Jan 30, 2024
@bartkrak bartkrak self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
@bartkrak bartkrak mentioned this issue Mar 5, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bartkrak bartkrak

Labels
enhancement
Projects
Smackore
Archived in project
What's happening in Membrane?
  
Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mat-hek @bartkrak @mickel8