Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Feature: Location Accuracy #4

Closed
mendhak opened this issue Jun 20, 2011 · 2 comments
Closed

New Feature: Location Accuracy #4

mendhak opened this issue Jun 20, 2011 · 2 comments

Comments

@mendhak
Copy link
Owner

mendhak commented Jun 20, 2011

jlmkerr[CodePlex]
Battery life is key to this app. A user doesn't want to run out of phone because their geotag is updating. If you could have an option to use cell tower location only (without disabling GPS for other apps) that would be great. This could be done through a 'location accuracy' setting that also could reduce the accuracy required from the GPS, further improving battery. For example, if I was happy to have a location accuracy of 20m then GPS would be used until it could get a good enough lock to provide this. However, if my location accuracy was set to 100m then the GPS would not need to be powered on for as long as it can get this level of accuracy from fewer satelites. A location accuracy of 500m or more could be provided from cell tower information alone, dramatically reducing battery consumption.
This feature would also affect the distance interval setting, so that the distance interval would be at least as great as the location acuracy setting.

@mendhak
Copy link
Owner Author

mendhak commented Jun 20, 2011

mendhak[CodePlex]
Hi, I had a look at this - unfortunately, setting the accuracy isn't related to power consumption in Android, the OS will simply keep reading the location regardless of accuracy, so the only limits that can be placed will be via code - this basically means that it'll use the same amount of power. What I will do, though, is let the user prefer cell tower based locations over GPS based so that it saves more power.

@mendhak
Copy link
Owner Author

mendhak commented Jun 20, 2011

            Resolved with changeset 43297.

@mendhak mendhak closed this as completed Jun 20, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant