Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test of meta_dummy_exploration.R #86

Closed
LittleBeannie opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #91
Closed

test of meta_dummy_exploration.R #86

LittleBeannie opened this issue Oct 27, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #91
Assignees
@howardbaek @ginnaram13
Labels
independent test

Comments

@LittleBeannie
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@nanxstats nanxstats changed the title tets of meta_dummy_exploration.R test of meta_dummy_exploration.R Oct 27, 2022
@LittleBeannie
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LittleBeannie commented Nov 1, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Test plan of meta_dummy_exploration, which is similar to meta_dummy. The output of

x <- meta_dummy_exploration(data = r2rtf::r2rtf_adsl, group = "TRT01A", name = "apat")

has

  • 1 analysis plan "exploration"
  • 1 population "apat"
  • 1 observation "inf"
  • 48 parameters, which is exactly the original variables and labels from the data = r2rtf::r2rtf_adsl

@howardbaek howardbaek linked a pull request Nov 2, 2022 that will close this issue
test case for meta_dummy_exploration() #91
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@howardbaek howardbaek

@ginnaram13 ginnaram13

Labels
independent test
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

test case for meta_dummy_exploration() Merck/metalite
3 participants
@LittleBeannie @howardbaek @ginnaram13