Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[opencollective] add support for voting via comments on expense #136

Open
gigxz opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

[opencollective] add support for voting via comments on expense #136

gigxz opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
component: plugin New plugin request, or feature request on an existing plugin priority: low low priority

Comments

@gigxz
Copy link
Collaborator

gigxz commented Oct 18, 2021

No description provided.

@gigxz gigxz added the component: plugin New plugin request, or feature request on an existing plugin label Oct 18, 2021
@shaunagm
Copy link
Collaborator

shaunagm commented Dec 2, 2021

@mashton can you flesh this out a little bit? Is this a partner/user request? What's the path forward for implementing this?

@gigxz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gigxz commented Dec 2, 2021

This was suggested/requested by Nathan for E2CC. I think the desired behavior is to vote on an expense using emoji-reactions on a comment on the expense. Or, people could vote by commenting "approve" or "disapprove" or whatever the options are. We could either modify the existing OC Governance Process or create a new one.

@shaunagm
Copy link
Collaborator

shaunagm commented Dec 2, 2021

Gotcha - I'm remembering that too from the initial meeting. I'm going to prioritize this as low until we get confirmation from E2C that they actually want this.

@shaunagm shaunagm added the priority: low low priority label Dec 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: plugin New plugin request, or feature request on an existing plugin priority: low low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants