Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Congratulations and question #107

Closed
frederikhors opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

Congratulations and question #107

frederikhors opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@frederikhors
Copy link

I discovered this project today from the jsonapi website.

Thanks for your job well done!

Just one question: if I start a project with this, can I be sure it won't be abandoned?

@frederikhors
Copy link
Author

It would be great if we could create a real project (like https://github.com/gothinkster/realworld) by also agreeing together a JS client library if not server-rendered in Go.

And I'd also like to use clean architecture.

@mfcochauxlaberge
Copy link
Owner

It would be great if we could create a real project (like https://github.com/gothinkster/realworld) by also agreeing together a JS client library if not server-rendered in Go.

This is not something I planned to do for now, but anyone is free to give it a go.

And I'd also like to use clean architecture.

Are you talking about refactoring this library so that it fits the clean architecture? This is a library, not a framework. It can be part of a system to follows this convention. If not, let me know what I can do to improve it.

To answer your first question, I can only say that for now I don't intend on abandoning this project. But you can't be sure it won't be abandoned. That is true for pretty much all projects to a certain extent.

@frederikhors
Copy link
Author

Are you talking about refactoring this library so that it fits the clean architecture?

Nope. I was referring to the demo that I hope to write together with those who want it.

@mfcochauxlaberge
Copy link
Owner

Are you talking about refactoring this library so that it fits the clean architecture?

Nope. I was referring to the demo that I hope to write together with those who want it.

Ah, in that case, I suppose whoever wants to build the demo can choose the architecture.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants