Proposal: Change name of decorator "Wove" to something better

[matthewadams]

I find the name Wove nonintuitive for that decorator. The English simple past participle wove doesn't really fit here and causes it to read awkwardly.

Better names, IMHO, include (but are not necessarily limited to):

• Advised
• Woven

Once a better name is chosen, backward compatibility could be provided by aliasing Wove and deprecating its usage in favor of the new name.

[mgechev]

I like Advised. Feel free to open a PR with the change.

[matthewadams]

This is lower priority for me, so I'll submit when I have time. In the meantime, I'm doing the following:

import { Wove as Advised } from 'aspect.js'
...
@Advised()
export default class Thing { // ...

[matthewadams]

After adding a few issues, PRs, etc, I've noticed that the term "wove" is used incorrectly in many places throughout the codebase. This issue should probably be increased in scope to address all usages of the word "wove".

[mgechev]

I'd suggest releasing 0.8.0 once we have this issue resolved.

[mgechev]

If you find anything else which requires refactoring, feel free to open a PR.

[matthewadams]

@mgechev, These changes in ffa52fa break backward compatibility AFAICT. I was assuming that this project abides by [semver](https://www.semver.org] versioning semantics, so a breaking change necessitates a major version bump.

I'm not sure what you mean by "I'd suggest releasing 0.8.0 once we have this issue resolved." I feel that you should release 0.8.0 now, because it adds a new feature & fixes a bug, but is otherwise backward compatible with 0.7.5. I feel that these changes should cause the version to go to 1.0.0.

[mgechev]

Yes, I wrote this comment before this one. Once we're happy with the current state of aspect.js, I'll publish 1.0.0.

[matthewadams]

Ah, ok, gotcha. :)