Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2021. It is now read-only.

feat: enable to define baumeister config in package.json #270

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 15, 2019
Merged

Conversation

mischah
Copy link
Member

@mischah mischah commented Feb 14, 2019

You now can decide to store your settings either in a file called baumeister.json (respectively .baumeister.json) or in a baumeister key in your package.json file 🎉

@mischah mischah merged commit 217bdd2 into master Feb 15, 2019
@mischah mischah deleted the cosmiconfig branch February 15, 2019 15:14
mischah added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
This way we can get rid of the following files:

```
/.babelrc
/.eslintrc.json
/.prettierrc
/.stylelintrc.json
/baumeister.json
```

It’s a trend that tools make it possible to store their settings in a field in the `package.json`. I recently enabled Baumeister to handle his configuration this way. See [#270 – feat: enable to define baumeister config in package.json](#270).

I’d like the approach, because the project root is less cluttered with dotfiles and you can see all the configs in one place.
mischah added a commit to micromata/generator-baumeister that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
This way we can get rid of the following files:

```
/.babelrc
/.eslintrc.json
/.prettierrc
/.stylelintrc.json
/baumeister.json
```

It’s a trend that tools make it possible to store their settings in a field in the `package.json`. I recently enabled Baumeister to handle his configuration this way. See [#270 – feat: enable to define baumeister config in package.json](micromata/Baumeister#270).

I’d like the approach, because the project root is less cluttered with dotfiles and you can see all the configs in one place.
mischah added a commit to micromata/generator-baumeister that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
This way we can get rid of the following files:

```
/.babelrc
/.eslintrc.json
/.prettierrc
/.stylelintrc.json
/baumeister.json
```

It’s a trend that tools make it possible to store their settings in a field in the `package.json`. I recently enabled Baumeister to handle his configuration this way. See [#270 – feat: enable to define baumeister config in package.json](micromata/Baumeister#270).

I’d like the approach, because the project root is less cluttered with dotfiles and you can see all the configs in one place.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant