Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider possible integrations with Langchain4j #10009

Open
sdelamo opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Consider possible integrations with Langchain4j #10009

sdelamo opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
status: under consideration The issue is being considered, but has not been accepted yet type: enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sdelamo
Copy link
Collaborator

sdelamo commented Oct 23, 2023

Issue description

https://github.com/langchain4j/langchain4j
@sdelamo sdelamo added type: enhancement New feature or request status: under consideration The issue is being considered, but has not been accepted yet labels Oct 23, 2023
@joaquindiez
Copy link

I think this integration would be nice to speed up the development of application that use LLM models

@CezaryBD
Copy link

Hello. Is there any WIP for this feature or still under consideration/refinement and not yet ready for implementation?
Just curious.

@sdelamo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sdelamo commented Feb 16, 2024

@CezaryBD No work has been done for this yet.

@anandjaisy
Copy link

@sdelamo Is there any work on this, curious about this feature.

@sdelamo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

sdelamo commented Apr 13, 2024

@sdelamo Is there any work on this, curious about this feature.

No work yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status: under consideration The issue is being considered, but has not been accepted yet type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Roadmap Top Level Features
Status: No status
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@sdelamo @joaquindiez @anandjaisy @CezaryBD