New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MicroProfile 6.1 Specification Review #197
Comments
We're updating our release review process by integrating the review checklist directly into your GitHub workflow. This change will enhance our ability to provide more effective feedback within the context of each issue, leading to improved efficiency, collaboration, and the elimination of duplication. EMO REVIEW
Intellectual Property ManagementTo be completed by the EMO.
Open Source Rules of Engagement
Branding and TrademarksTo be completed by the EMO and PMC. The following applies when the project has a custom website. To the best of our knowledge:
Things to check:
Legal DocumentationRequired files:
Recommended files:
See examples for Security file and Code of Conduct. Required elements:
Recommended elements:
Metadata (PMI)To be completed by the EMO
|
Please consider adding recommended files (i.e. Code of Conduct and Security) directly in each project repository. |
Transitive CVEs in MP and Jakarta component specs, that are not addressed yet completely:
The last two of them are Jakarta related and out of scope here, but might require an additional release when fixed there too. |
The EMO review has concluded successfully. Please continue with your release. SPec Ballot results: MicroProfile 6.1 Ballot has passed |
Specification issue template
When creating a specification project release review, create an issue in the MicroProfile-WG repository repo with the content defined as follows.
Release Review
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: