Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sentinel-1 GRD geolocation #272

Open
harryC-space-intelligence opened this issue Sep 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Sentinel-1 GRD geolocation #272

harryC-space-intelligence opened this issue Sep 27, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@harryC-space-intelligence

Sentinel-1 GRD data in some regions are not well geolocated.

For example at (lat = 1.015326, lon= -76.483238):

image

This image is the mean from all of the data-takes in 2020 (relative orbit 142), suggesting this is a systematic issue with how the data are georeferenced.

After trying randomly 3 other areas, I found another example at (-8.968573,26.672217):

image

The RTC products are not affected.

Is this issue known / intentional? I do not understand what is meant by "The ellipsoid projection of the GRD products is corrected using the terrain height specified in the product general annotation. The terrain height used varies in azimuth but is constant in range (but can be different for each IW/EW sub-swath)" -- is this processing chain documented somewhere?

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

TomAugspurger commented Sep 27, 2023

My limited understanding is that GRD products will often have this issue, and that RTC is provided to solve this exact problem.

We have https://planetarycomputer.microsoft.com/docs/tutorials/customizable-rtc-sentinel1/, which goes into some of the background. Our RTC product uses a different algorithm than sarsen but it's the same general idea.

The upstream ESA documentation linked from the dataset detail page probably has more information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants