You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sentinel-1 GRD data in some regions are not well geolocated.
For example at (lat = 1.015326, lon= -76.483238):
This image is the mean from all of the data-takes in 2020 (relative orbit 142), suggesting this is a systematic issue with how the data are georeferenced.
After trying randomly 3 other areas, I found another example at (-8.968573,26.672217):
The RTC products are not affected.
Is this issue known / intentional? I do not understand what is meant by "The ellipsoid projection of the GRD products is corrected using the terrain height specified in the product general annotation. The terrain height used varies in azimuth but is constant in range (but can be different for each IW/EW sub-swath)" -- is this processing chain documented somewhere?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sentinel-1 GRD data in some regions are not well geolocated.
For example at (lat = 1.015326, lon= -76.483238):
This image is the mean from all of the data-takes in 2020 (relative orbit 142), suggesting this is a systematic issue with how the data are georeferenced.
After trying randomly 3 other areas, I found another example at (-8.968573,26.672217):
The RTC products are not affected.
Is this issue known / intentional? I do not understand what is meant by "The ellipsoid projection of the GRD products is corrected using the terrain height specified in the product general annotation. The terrain height used varies in azimuth but is constant in range (but can be different for each IW/EW sub-swath)" -- is this processing chain documented somewhere?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: