Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarification on the note about the data jobs #165

Open
reza8iucs opened this issue Jan 2, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Clarification on the note about the data jobs #165

reza8iucs opened this issue Jan 2, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@reza8iucs
Copy link

Hi,

In the installation guide, it's stated that

"Note! Recurring data jobs are not the recommended way of integrating with D365FO anymore. In platform update 5 a new method was introduced. This new method does not require any batch jobs running in D365FO (unlike recurring data jobs) and its setup is simplified. This new method is supported by Recurring Integrations Scheduler and is described later in this guide.**"

Can you please clarify where in the guide this new method is described?

Thanks

@TomekMelissa
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, this recommendation is a bit outdated atm. The new method mentioned here is the use of Package API introduced in PU5. In terms of RIS nomenclature "Old" are Upload and Download jobs, "New" are Export and Import.

@reza8iucs
Copy link
Author

reza8iucs commented Jan 3, 2023

Thanks for your reply. Is it safe to say that Recurring APIs (Dequeue and Enqueue) are what's considered as "Old" way of doing high volume integration according to the recommendation?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants