Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Providing substitue for _aligned_malloc and _aligned_free #37

Open
mjsabby opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Providing substitue for _aligned_malloc and _aligned_free #37

mjsabby opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@mjsabby
Copy link

mjsabby commented Apr 28, 2024

Is there a reason why in the test module and the new user module that the allocation functions are not settable by the library user?

For example, it's possible a user may want to use the stack for providing memory in super high performance scenarios.

Sorry this is more of a discussion but I didn't see the discussion tab open.

@mjsabby
Copy link
Author

mjsabby commented Apr 28, 2024

I create #38 for this.

@NielsFerguson
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for looking at the code and thinking about how to improve it.

See my comment on the pull request as to why I don't see how this would be an improvement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants