Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python Support #38

Closed
jxnl opened this issue Jul 21, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #148
Closed

Python Support #38

jxnl opened this issue Jul 21, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #148
Labels
In Discussion Scope or design nuances need to be discussed Suggestion New feature or request

Comments

@jxnl
Copy link

jxnl commented Jul 21, 2023

Hey I’m solo developing https://github.com/jxnl/openai_function_call

Would love to work together to find abstractions. I’ll likely take and cite a lot of the great documentation you have.

@hax
Copy link

hax commented Jul 24, 2023

It seems some old commits of typechat also had experimental python support.

@steveluc
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, we are still experimenting with that! The main point of investigation is what schema language to use for prompting and validation.

@Duncanr-glitch
Copy link

Just my two cents, but I would hope even in a python package to still be able to provide a typescript schema in addition to python typing since typescript is IMHO more robust and dev friendly than python types

@DanielRosenwasser DanielRosenwasser added Suggestion New feature or request In Discussion Scope or design nuances need to be discussed labels Aug 3, 2023
@DanielRosenwasser DanielRosenwasser changed the title Python typechat. Python Support Aug 3, 2023
@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

DanielRosenwasser commented Dec 15, 2023

Hey folks, we have a PR for the basis of Python support over here: #148

We won't be shipping right away, so some stuff will likely still change post-merge, but if people have thoughts or opinions (now or later), I wouldn't mind some feedback!

@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

Just a question - how do people feel about an API that's all-async?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
In Discussion Scope or design nuances need to be discussed Suggestion New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants