Supporting negative types is very convenient

[Autumn-one]

Suggestion

🔍 Search Terms

Negated types

✅ Viability Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

• This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
• This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

⭐ Suggestion

Many typescript users want the ability to negate types

type NotStr = not string;

At present, typescript does not have real negative types, but if negative types can be applied in some actual development scenarios, it will be able to express types more clearly and directly. I think this is the basic function that a Type system should have. Without this function, developers may use some imprecise and complex ways to implement flexibly, which is not good
I've seen a PR that was turned off, which is a real shame
#29317

[xiBread]

Duplicate of #4196 (#29317 (comment))

[typescript-bot]

This issue has been marked as "Duplicate" and has seen no recent activity. It has been automatically closed for house-keeping purposes.